animal ethics Flashcards Preview

animal behaviour > animal ethics > Flashcards

Flashcards in animal ethics Deck (11)
Loading flashcards...
1
Q

when are animals used as resources?

A

zoos

farms

laboratories

pets

2
Q

Pros and cons from the perspective of a pet animal

A
  • enforce their dependence on us and that seems wrong
  • some pets suffer

________________

  • some oets are loved and respected
  • a life as a pet is better than many of the alternatives (including the most likely alternatives)
3
Q

what are four questions you should ask in terms of ethics in zoos?

A

Does the zoo environment mimic the natural environment of the animal? 

Are they well treated? 

Are they safer/healthier in the zoo than in the wild? 

Is the zoo participating in a broader program to help the species?

4
Q

name and briefly describe the three major positions in animal ethics

A

-exceptionalism

humans are seen as special. We have only derivative duties to animals (All humans have, & All non-human animals lack)

-abolitionism

The claim that non-human animals have a moral status that is incompatible with the use of animals as the resources of human beings: 

Food 

Clothing 

Entertainment 

Test subjects

-welfarism (Welfarists disagree about what suffering is unnecessary.)

we have some duties to animals, but don’t prevent us from (sometimes) legitemately using animals

5
Q

What argument could be used to support an abolitionist position, if one claimed that there is *no good reason* to cause pain to animals?

A
  1. animals can experience pain
  2. pain is bad
  3. it is wrong to impose something bad on any being without a good reason for doing so
  4. therefore it is wrong to cause pain to animals without a good reason
6
Q

 If abolitionists (and the stricter welfarists) are right, then many of our current practices are deeply immoral.

give some examples for animal use today

A
  • riding horses
  • having pets
  • working elephants
  • eating meat
  • laboratory testing
7
Q

why would we want to test things on animals?

A

: The benefits (to humans and non-human animals) of continuing to use animals in lab settings, outweigh the costs (harms to the animals used). So, we should use them

-> tests on rats safe human lives (can test drugs without killing humans)

If animal testing, considered overall, enhances the wellbeing in the world, we should do it. Further, we should do whatever amount of it, in whatever way, maximises overall wellbeing.​

8
Q

Name four arguments for and four arguments agains animal testing

A

YES?

  • Coronary bypass surgery – developed through research with dogs. 
  • Diabetes – Insulin discovered through dog research. (Helps animals too! Dogs & cats also suffer from diabetes) -Dementia research – new therapies developed from research with mice and primates 
  • Cancer

NO? 

  • Some animal testing leads us in the wrong direction – hard to translate from other animals to us. 
  • Is animal testing the most cost-effective way to achieve these results? 
  • Were the animals treated well in the process? 
  • How many animals died? 
9
Q

what are the three R’s of animal welfare

A

Replacement  Methods which avoid or replace the use of animals

Reduction  Methods which minimise the number of animals used per experiment

Refinement  Methods which minimise animal suffering and improve welfare

10
Q

what matters in welfarism?

A

We only use animals when we have reason to believe that doing so will provide benefits that other methods do not provide.

We treat the animals we use well (where ‘well’ needs to be cashed out…)

We optimise our experiments so we need as few animals as possible

11
Q
A