Problem 7 - DONE Flashcards

theory of mind

1
Q

theory of mind

A

= a well organised understanding of how the mind works and how it influences behaviour (siegler)

  • continuous development
  • mental representation = person’s set of beliefs about the world
  • -> different people represent it in different ways (can have false/incorrect beliefs)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

false belief task

A
  • test of understanding mental representations
  • 4 years: don’t succeed; do not understand acting on basis of beliefs
    criticism:
  • not sensitive enough for young children
    –> implicit false belief (smarties)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

sally-anne task

A
  • simpler version
  • 3 years: unable to understand
  • 4 years: succeed
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

smarties task

A
  • 3 years: lack insight into their own minds; don’t acknowledge their earlier belief
  • -> before 4 years: difficulty understanding that another person can have a false belief about the world
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

theory of mind before age 4

A
  • distinguishing mental states in language
  • understanding relationship between seeing and knowing
  • understanding the appearance-reality distinction
  • predicting behaviour
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

distinguishing mental states in language

A
  • 2 years: start using words that refer to internal states of perception/emotion (see, want, look)
  • 3 years: use cognitive terms (know, think, remember)
  • -> distinguish between mental states and external reality
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

understanding relationship between seeing and knowing

A
  • 2 years: some understanding
  • 3 years: understand that different people have different knowledge about the world; some may less complete knowledge
  • 4 years: realise that people may have different views of object that is visible to both
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

understanding the appearance-reality distinction

A
  • 3 years: difficulty considering two representations of object at the same time; only consider one interpretation (what they know it is); do not realise that appearance of representation can be changed
  • 4 years: understand that object can be represented as what it looks like + what it is: awareness that at least one representation is false
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

predicting behaviour

A
  • 2 years: understand that people have desires, these can influence behaviour
  • 3 years: people have desires + beliefs about world; do not understand yet that people can act on inaccurate beliefs
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

when is theory of mind achieved?

A
  • above 4 years: usually pass false-belief asks
  • -> appreciate that other people’s behaviour may be based on false assumption about world
  • -> behaviour of person is based on own representation of the world
  • interpret and predict behaviour of people around them
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

factors contributing to achieving theory of mind

A
  • language development
  • interaction with members of family
  • child-child interaction
  • -> older children/siblings
  • family size
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

theory of mind after age 4

A
  • understand that emotional responses, surprise reactions are based on person’s representation
  • deceptive behaviour = planting a false belief in another person’s mind
  • understanding second order belief = someone can have beliefs about a third person
    –> I think that she thinks, that he thinks that…
    (- before: first order belief = having a belief about someone having a belief
    –> I think that she thinks that…)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

theories about development of understanding the mind

A
  • Wellman
  • Perner
  • Leslie
  • Harris
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Wellman’s theory

A

three phases:

  1. 2 years: theory based on desire psychology (people’s desire influence their behaviour)
  2. 3 years: theory based on belief-desire psychology (person has desire and beliefs)
    - -> beliefs as copy of the world
  3. 4 years: theory includes realisation that beliefs are interpretations
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Perner’s theory

A
  • emphasis on change that happens at 4 years: children start understanding false belief
  • most important aspect of understanding mind: acquisition of metarepresentation
  • -> metarepresentation = understanding of distinction between what is being referred to and what it is represented (appearance-reality)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Leslie’s theory

A
  • metarepresentation in relation to pretend play
  • ability to coordinate pretend play: understand what is reality and what is play
    –> metarepresentation = secondary representation = play world
    (primary representation = object as it is = real world)
17
Q

Harris’ theory

A
  • children can understand others’ emotions by using simulation
  • know own emotions –> project emotions onto others
18
Q

features of autism

A
main features:
- autistic aloneness
- desire for sameness
secondary features:
- language difficulty
- lack of spontaneous activities
- islets of ability
19
Q

precursors of theory of mind

lecture

A
  • face perception & gaze following
  • joint attention
  • pretense
  • visual perspective-taking
  • appearance-reality
  • desire
20
Q

precursors - face perception & gaze following

lecture

A
  • increased sensitivity to faces
  • between 8 and 14 months: active gaze following
  • 18 months: use gaze to guide object choice
21
Q

precursors - joint attention

lecture

A
  • understanding focus of another’s attention
  • dyadic joint attention (eye contact; two people)
  • -> 3 months: sensitive to few degrees in gaze aversion
  • triadic joint attention (involves third party)
  • -> 12 months: use own gaze to engage mothers while pointing
  • -> 18 months: determine others focus of attention; use of eye gaze and other directional cues
  • -> 24 months: use gaze to gain info about other’s desire
22
Q

precursors - pretense

lecture

A

= pretend play
- dual representation:
–> reality + world of imagination
(leslie theory)

23
Q

precursors - desire

lecture

A
  • young infants: show what they want through pointing
  • 2 years: understand behaviour based on desires
    (broccoli experiment)
24
Q

precursors - appearance-reality

lecture

A
  • 3 years: fail

- 4 years: pass

25
Q

precursors - perspective taking

A
  • level 1: understanding that another person sees an object only if the person’s eyes are open and directed toward the object
  • -> 2 and 3 years
  • level 2: understanding that even though both see the same object, it looks different to people viewing it from different perspectives
  • -> 4 and 5 years
26
Q

theories

lecture

A

domain general: development of ToM stems from a general skill which has effect on several different areas: ToM abilities, but also understanding of physical objects, language… (piaget)

domain specific: development of ToM stems from special knowledge, special processes and mechanisms that only affect ToM skills (chomsky)

27
Q

domain general theories - executive function hypothesis

lecture

A

(Carlson)
- preschool: information processing skills increase
–> executive functions: planning, inhibition, self-regulation
=> important, but not sufficient

28
Q

domain general theories - representational mind-account

lecture

A

(Perner)

  • with increasing age: own representational abilities develop
  • false photograph task
  • -> incorrect: autism fail false-belief but succeed on false photograph
29
Q

domain-specific theories - theory theories

lecture

A

(Wellman)

- child develops step by step a more complex theory about the mind

30
Q

domain-specific theories - theory of mind module

lecture

A

(Baron-Cohen)

- specific brain mechanism devoted to understanding of other human beings

31
Q

autism

lecture

A

= complex developmental disability

32
Q

characteristics of autism (DSM-V)

lecture

A
  1. deficits in social communication and social interactions
    - -> deficits in social-emotional reciprocity; non-verbal communicative behaviour in social interaction; developing, maintaining and understanding relationships
  2. restricted, repetitive patterns of behaviour, interests, activities
    - -> stereotyped/repetitive motor movements; insistence on sameness, routines, rituals; fixated interests; hyper- or hypo-activity to sensory input
33
Q

biological theories of autism

lecture

A
  • complex genetic predisposition
  • -> environment can change gene expression (environmental toxins, stress)
  • brain abnormalities (disturbed migration, insufficient pruning)
  • disconnection syndrome
  • -> different areas are not well connected (functional & structural)
34
Q

psychological theories of autism

lecture

A
  • theory of mind deficit hypothesis
  • executive dysfunction hypothesis
  • weak central coherence hypothesis
35
Q

psychological theories - theory of mind deficit hypothesis

lecture

A
  • domain-specific theory
  • cannot mentalise
    –> poor understanding of functions of mind; no understanding of seeing & knowing; fail appearance-reality tests
    criticism:
  • not specific to autism
  • not explain non-social abnormalities
  • can improve on ToM tasks –> not in real-life social functioning
36
Q

psychological theories - executive dysfunction hypothesis

lecture

A
  • domain-general theory
  • executive functions are impaired
    –> cognitive flexibility (explains need for sameness, lack of impulse)
    criticism:
  • not all show executive dysfunction
  • not specific to autism
37
Q

psychological theories - weak central coherence hypothesis

lecture

A
  • domain-general theory
  • weak/absent drive for global coherence (global picture)
    –> focus on details (explains some symptoms)
    criticism:
  • not supported by all studies
  • prefer detailed approach –> still able to see global picture