Problem 1 - DONE Flashcards
cognitive development
themes in child development
- nature and nurture
- active/passive child
- continuity/discontinuity
- individual differences
(- mechanisms of developmental change)
(- sociocultural context)
(- research on children’s welfare)
nature and nurture - how do nature and nurture together shape development?
- constant interaction of our genes and our environment
nature
- biological endowment
- genes we receive from our parents
- -> influences every aspect of our make-up (broad characteristics to specific preferences)
nurture
- environments that influence our development
- both physical and social
- -> homes we grew up in, schools
active child - how do children shape their own development?
children’s contribution can be seen in multiple ways
- -> increasing contribution with increasing age (choose environments etc.)
- attentional patterns: selection of what to pay attention to (mother)
- language use: internal motivation to practice talking
- play: internal motivation to play with themselves
continuity/discontinuity - in what ways is development continuous and in what ways is it discontinuous?
- depends on how you look at development + how often you look
- -> parents and more distal relatives have different views
continuous development
- idea that changes with age occur gradually, in small increments
= pine tree growing taller and taller
–> skill by skill rather than unified way
discontinuous development
- idea that changes with age include occasional large shifts
= transition from caterpillar to cocoon to butterfly
–> stage theories = propose that development involves a series of discontinuous, age-related phases (Piaget, Freud, etc.)
mechanisms of developmental change - how does change occur?
- brain activity
- genes
- learning experiences
sociocultural context - how does the sociocultural context influence development?
- sociocultural context = physical, social, cultural, economic and historical circumstances that make up any child’s environment
—> influences every aspect of children’s development
individual differences - how do children become so different from one another?
- genetic differences
- differences in treatment by parents and others
- differences in reactions to similar experiences
research and children’s welfare - how can research promote children’s well-being?
- improved understanding leads to practical benefits
Jean Piaget’s theory of cognitive development
- swiss developmental psychologist
- between birth and adolescence children go through four stages of cognitive growth, each characterised by distinct intellectual abilities and ways of understanding the world
view of children’s nature - Piaget
- active child
1. constructivist = constructing knowledge for themselves in response to their experiences
2. learn on their own (not depending on instructions from adults)
3. intrinsic motivation to learn + do not need extrinsic motivation
–> little scientists, trying to understand the world on their own; intent on mastering physical, mathematical, logical concepts that are the same in all times and places; qualitative changes in thinking
central developmental issues
nature and nurture - Piaget
nurture: every experience the child encounters
nature: child’s motivation to meet two basic functions that are central to cognitive growth
- adaptation = tendency to respond to the demands of the environment in ways that meet one’s goals
- organisation = tendency to integrate particular observations into coherent knowledge
central developmental issues
sources of continuity - Piaget
- scheme = organised pattern of thought or behaviour
- assimilation = interpreting new ideas or experiences to fit existing schemes
- accommodation = changing existing schemes to fit new ideas or experiences
- equilibrium = balancing assimilation and accommodation to create stable understanding
phases of equilibrium
- equilibrium: children are satisfied with their understanding of a phenomenon –> children do not see any discrepancies
- disequilibrium: new information leads children to perceive that their understanding is inadequate –> recognise shortcomings
- more stable equilibrium: more sophisticated understanding that eliminates the shortcomings of the old one