1
Q
Is CBT ethical in terms of causing physical harm
A
- Yes
- If the treatment is innefecttive it does not cause physical harm and no side effects arise like in aversion therapy
2
Q
Is CBT ethical in terms of consent
A
- Yes
- Clients usually consent and have the right to withdraw
3
Q
Is CBT ethical in terms of Psychological harm
A
- No
- At the begining of the treatment the client might face elavated levels of psychological harm whilst explaining their dysfunctional automatic thoughts
- Stress, anxiety, humiliation etc
4
Q
What is the problem with CBT assuming the client is responsible for their disorder
A
- Important situational factors may be overlooked which are contributing to the clients disorder such as family problems or life events that the client is not in a position to change
- Blaming the client can be counterproductive
5
Q
What is a problem with CBT in terms of the definition of rational
A
An irrational thought to a therapist may not be irrational to the client so trying to get the client to change these thoughts will not help as the client wont be able to see them as irrational
6
Q
What did Alloy and Abrahamson find
A
- Depressive realists tend to see things for what they are, normal people have a tendancy to distort things in a positive way
- Depressed people display the sader but wiser effect and they are more accurate in their estimates of disaster and non-depressed people
7
Q
What could Alloy and Abrahamsons findings mean
A
That CBT can damage self-esteem which is a form of psychological harm
8
Q
How is CBT unethical in terms of labelling
A
A patient may be labelled as someone who has had therapy which may make them feel even worse about themselves and make other people treat them differntly
9
Q
How is CBT unethical in term of vulnerable individuals
A
Patients could be younger than 16. This means they are unable to give valid consent
A-Level Psychology - Eduqas
flashcards
Decks in class (161)
# Cards
-
Exam Terms15
-
Chapter 1: Biological Approach Assumptions15
-
1.1.1 Localisation of Brain Function (Bi) x25
-
1.1.1 Neurotransmitters (Bi) x29
-
1.1.1 Evolutionary influences (Bi) x11
-
1.1.1 Biological explanation for relationship formation14
-
1.1.2 Psychosurgery11
-
1.1.2 Psychosurgery evaluation11
-
1.1.3 Strengths & Weaknesses (Biological Approach)22
-
1.1.4 Classic Research (Bi)22
-
1.1.4 Raine Et Al Study (Bi)58
-
1.1.4 Evaluation Of Raine Study15
-
1.1.5 Biological Debate54
-
1.2.1 Tripartite Personality (PD)21
-
1.2.1 The Unconcious Mind (PD)26
-
1.2.1 Childhood Experiences (PD)34
-
1.2.1 Psychodynamic explanation for relationship formation16
-
1.2.2 applications of assumptions Dream Analysis (PD)15
-
1.2.2 Dreams As Wish Fullfillment (PD)8
-
1.2.2 Symbolic Nature Of Dreams (PD)8
-
1.2.2 Dreamwork & The Therapist (PD)16
-
1.2.2 Ethics Of dream Analysis (Ps)13
-
1.2.2 Effectiveness Of Dream Analysis (Ps)12
-
1.2.3 strengths and weaknesses (psychodynamic approach)23
-
1.2.4 Bowlby Methodology And Procedure (PD)26
-
1.2.4 Bowlby Findings And Conclusions (PD)29
-
1.2.4 Bowlby Evaluation14
-
1.2.5 debate - mother as the primary care giver for and against47
-
1.2.5 debate - mother as the primary care giver evaluation14
-
1.2.5 debate - mother as the primary care giver conclusion5
-
1.2.6 Compare & Contrast Psychodynamic19
-
1.3.1 The Behaviourist Approach (Be)10
-
1.3.1 Blank Slate Assumption (Be)11
-
1.3.1 Conditioning Assumption (Be)44
-
1.3.1 Learning Assumption (Be)10
-
1.3.1 Behaviourist explanation for relationship formation8
-
1.3.2 application of behaviourist approach to aversion therapy6
-
1.3.2 Main components of Aversion therapy6
-
1.3.2 Evaluation of aversion therapy14
-
1.3.3 Strengths And Weaknesses Of behaviourist Approach (Be)24
-
1.3.4 Classical Research - Little Albert43
-
1.3.4 Evaluation Of Little Albert25
-
1.3.4 Ethics & Social Of Little Albert21
-
1.3.5 Conditioning Techniques To Control Children61
-
1.3.6 Compare & Contrast Behaviourist19
-
1.4.1 Internal Mental Processes (Co)14
-
1.4.1 Computer Analogy (Co)17
-
1.4.1 Schemas (Co)15
-
1.4.1 Cognitive explanation for relationship formation9
-
1.4.2 apply Cognitive approach to CBT8
-
1.4.2 Main components of CBT14
-
1.4.2 CBT effectivness evaluation13
-
1.4.2 CBT ethics evaluation9
-
1.4.3 strengths & weaknesses cognitive (Co)29
-
1.4.4 - Classic Research Loftus & palmer (Co)51
-
1.4.4 Evaluation Of Loftus And Palmer Study (co)26
-
1.4.5 Cognitive Debate - Reliability Of EWT82
-
1.4.6 Compare & Contrast Cognitive20
-
1.5.1 Acknowledgement Of Free Will (Po)9
-
1.5.1 Authenticity Of Goodness And Excellence (Ps)11
-
1.5.1 The Good Life (Po)11
-
1.5.2 Effectiveness Of Mindfulness (Po)13
-
1.5.2 Ethics Of Mindfulness (Po)17
-
1.5.2 Mindfulness - Application of Assumptions (Po)10
-
1.5.2 Mindfulness (Po)25
-
1.5.3 Strengths & Weaknesses Positive29
-
1.5.4 Who Is Happy?60
-
1.5.4 Evaluation Of Who Is Happy26
-
1.5.4 Ethical & Social Myers & Deiner10
-
1.5.5 The relevance of positive psychology53
-
1.5.5 Relevance of positive psychology evaluation11
-
1.5.6 Compare & Contrast Positive18
-
2.1.1 Experimental Methodologies (RM)11
-
2.1.1 Research terminology36
-
2.2.1 Observations (non experimental)18
-
2.2.2 self report methods (non experimental)24
-
2.2.3 Analyses (content, correlational) (Non experimental)16
-
2.2.4 Studies (non experimental)13
-
2.2.5 Brain scans (non experimental)6
-
2.3.1 Participants & Probability sampling20
-
2.3.2 Non probability sampling15
-
2.3.3 Experimental designs31
-
2.4.1 Ethics43
-
2.4.2 Dealing with ethical issues and humans19
-
2.4.3 ethical issues and non human animals10
-
2.4.4 Reliability and Validity38
-
2.5.1 levels of measurement16
-
2.5.2 Descriptive statistics16
-
2.6.2 Social psychology & Milgram37
-
2.6.2 Developmental Psychology & Kohlberg37
-
2.6.2 Kohlberg Evaluation28
-
3.1.1 Characteristics of Addiction28
-
3.1.1 Issues when studying addiction9
-
3.1.2 Dopamine & addicton28
-
3.1.2 Evaluating dopamine & addiction18
-
3.1.2 Genetics & Addiction27
-
3.1.2 Evaluating Genes & Addiction24
-
3.1.2 Evaluating dopamine & genetic explanations10
-
3.1.3 Personality and Addiction20
-
3.1.3 Evaluation of personality & addiction26
-
3.1.3 Cognitive Biases (Add)23
-
3.1.3 Cognitive biases evaluation (Add)15
-
3.1.4 Media & Addiction25
-
3.1.4 Peer influences (Add)22
-
3.1.4 Media & Addiction evaluation22
-
3.1.4 Peer influences evaluation (Add)28
-
3.1.5 Agonist & Antagonist substitution (Add)27
-
3.1.5 Agonist & Antagonist Evaluation (Add)48
-
3.1.5 Aversion Therapy (Add)16
-
3.1.5 Aversion Therapy Evaluation (Add)32
-
3.2.1 Characteristics of schizophrenia28
-
3.2.1 issues in investigating schizophrenia16
-
3.2.2 Dopamine Explanation (Sch)28
-
3.2.2 Dopamine Hypothesis Evaluation (Sch)40
-
3.2.2 Structural Abnormalities (Sch)16
-
3.2.2 Structural Abnormalities Evaluation (Sch)14
-
3.2.3 Psychodynamic explanation of schizophrenia21
-
3.2.3 Psychodynamic Evaluation (Sch)37
-
3.2.3 Cognitive Explanations Of Schizophrenia42
-
3.2.3 Cognitive Evaluation (Sch)32
-
3.2.4 Sociocultural Factors (Sch)37
-
3.2.4 Dysfunctional Families exp. (Sch)25
-
3.2.4 Sociocultural Evaluation (Sch)36
-
3.2.4 Dysfunctional Families Evaluation (Sch)32
-
3.2.5 CBT components22
-
3.2.5 CBT evaluation effectivness18
-
3.2.5 CBT evaluation ethical implications13
-
3.2.5 CBT evaluation social implications9
-
3.3.2 Cortisol & chronic stress18
-
3.3.3 Type A & B Personalities (Str)27
-
3.3.3 Hardiness Evaluation (Str)33
-
3.3.4 Life Events (Str)31
-
3.3.4 Life Events Evaluation (Str)34
-
3.3.4 Daily Hassles (Str)30
-
3.4.1 Psychology Is A Science (Con)42
-
3.4.1 Psychology Isn't A Science (Con)32
-
3.4.3 Culture Bias (Con)50
-
3.2.1 diagnosing schizophrenia3
-
friday test7
-
3.5.1 Characteristics of criminal behaviour16
-
3.5.1 characteristics of crime19
-
3.5.2 genetics (bio)4
-
3.5.2 genetics evaluation (bio)12
-
3.5.2 Role of amygdala (bio)6
-
3.5.2 Role of the amygdala evaluation (bio)5
-
3.5.3 Eysenck criminal personality (individ dif)8
-
3.5.3 Eysenck's criminal personality evaluation (individ difs)7
-
3.5.3 Affection-less psychopath (imdivid diffs)6
-
3.5.3 affectionless psychopath evaluation (individ diffs)5
-
3.5.4 Differential association theory (social psych)9
-
3.5.4 differential association theory evaluation (social psych)11
-
3.5.4 gender socialisation (social psych)8
-
3.5.4 gender socialisation evaluation (social psych`)15
-
3.5.5 alternative explanations of criminal behaviour4
-
3.5.6 Methods of modifying criminal behaviour - restorative justice22
-
3.5.6 Methods of Modifying Criminal Behaviour - restorative justice evaluation7
-
3.5.6 Method of Modification: Anger management20
-
3.5.6 Method of Modification: Anger management evaluation14
-
3.5.6 Applying the explanations to methods of modifying criminal behaviour9
-
Psychology Researchers36
-
2 deliberately misleading or falsely informing PPS about the nature of research.22
