Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

1 USMLE Step 3 Main one > Statistics > Flashcards

Statistics Flashcards

1
Q

Calculate: crude mortality rate

A

Calculated by dividing the number of the deaths by the total population size.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Calculate: Cause-specific mortality rate

A

Calculated by dividing the number of deaths from a particular disease by the total popluation size

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Calculate: case fatality rate

A

calculated by dividing the number of deaths from a specific disease by the number of people affected by the disease.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Calculate: Standardized Mortality Ratio

A

Calcuated by dividing the observed number of deaths by the expect number of deaths. This measure is used sometimes in occupational epidemiology. SMR of 2.0 indicates that the observed mortality in a particular group is twice as high as that in the general population.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Calculate: Attack rate

A

an incidence measure typically used in infectious disease epidemiology. It is calculated by dividing the number of patients with diease by the total population at risk. For example, attack rate can be calculated for gastroenteritis among people who ate contaminated food.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Calculate: Maternal mortality rate

A

Calculated by dividing the number of maternal deaths by the number of live births

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Calculate: Crude birth rate

A

Defined as the number of live births divided by the total population

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What are the two basic measures of disease occurence?

A

Incidence and prevalence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Incidence rate

A

of new cases over a certain period

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Prevalence

A

of cases over # number of total persons

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Odds ratio

A

Probability of disease among the exposed/probability of disease among the non exposed (3/4)((a/c)/(b/d)). Described as the odds of disease is # among the exposed when compared to the unexposed. Associated with case control

○ odds of having disease in expose group / odds of having disease in unexposed group
= ad/bc

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Relative Risk

A

Culmative incidence of disease among the exposed / culmative incidence of disease among the unexposed. (1/2)(a/a+b)/(c/c+d) Described as exposed are # times more likely to develop X when compared to the unexposed.
Associated with cohort studies.

○ probablity of getting disease in exposed group / probability of getting disease in unexposed group
= [a/(a+b)] / [c/(c+d

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Attributable Risk

A

Decribed ast the number of cases which can be attributed to exposure. Calcuted by Culmative incidence of disease in the exposed minus the culmative indcidence of disease in the unexposed. (1/2)(a/a+b)-(c/c+d)

○ risk in exposed group - risk in unexposed group
= a/(a+b) - c/(c+d)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

PAR

PAR%

A

PAR is # of cases of C among total population attributed to exposure (5-2) and PAR% is the number of cases

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Lead time bias

A

E early dectection confused with increased survival

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Late look or Length bias

A

Information gathered at inapproiate time eq survery to study a fatal disease(only those patients still alive will be able to answer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Type 1 error (alpha)

A

“find something false” FP, detecting a difference when there is no difference. Reject the null hypothesis when the null hypothesis is true. eq test say man is preggo when he is not. Or FP error. also known as described as alpha which goes up with more power and increase sample size, expected effect size, and precision in measurement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

alpha equals

A

a=1-B

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Type 2 error (beta)

A

“miss something” FN, missing a true difference. Failing to reject a false null hypothesis. eq stating that a woman is not pregnant when she actually is. Described as beta. which goes down or decreases with more power and increase sample size, expected effect size, and precision in measurement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Attributable Risk Reduction%

A

Done after intervention (AR among control)-(AR among intervention group)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

NNT

A

NNT=1/ARR

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Relative risk reduction RRR

A

RRR=ARR/RR among non exposed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Confounding variable

A

Just because umbrella come out during the rain doesnt meant that the rain cause umbrella

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Dose-reponse

A

> increased level of exposure shows an increased relative risk of developing/odds ratio of having a disease

> can be used in OR or RR to support causality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Sensitivity (SN)

A

○ % with disease who test positive

= a/(a+c) = TP/(TP+FN)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

Specificity (SP)

A

○ % without disease who test negative

= d/(b+d) = TN/(FP+TN)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

Positive predictive value (PPV)

A

○ % positive test results that are true positives

= a/(a+b) = TP/(TP+FP)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

Negative predictive value (NPV)

A

○ % negative test results that are true negatives

= d/(c+d) = TN/(FN+TN)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

Sensitivity and specificity are intrinsic to the diagnostic test

A

○ do not change with prevalence

PPV and NPV do change with prevalence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves are a graphical depiction of a test’s performance

A

○ Y axis: sensitivity
○ X axis: 1-specificity
○ The higher the curve, the better the test
This is quantified by the AUC (area under the curve); an AUC of 0.5 states that the test performs no better than chance (bad test!), whereas an AUC of 0.9 suggests a better-performing test

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

Positive Skew

A

Asymmetrical with tail trailing off toright

Mean > median > model

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

Negative Skew

A

○Asymmetrical with tail trailing off toleft

Mean < median < mode

33
Q

○ Mean very ???to skew
○ Median somewhat ????to skew
Mode very ???to skew

A

○ Mean very sensitive to skew
○ Median somewhat resistant to skew
Mode very resistant to skew

34
Q

• A certain percentage of all observations will always fall within +/- certain standard deviations of the mean
○ +/- 1 Standard deviation = ???%
○ +/- 2 Standard deviations = ???%
+/- 3 Standard deviations = ???%

A

• A certain percentage of all observations will always fall within +/- certain standard deviations of the mean
○ +/- 1 Standard deviation = 68%
○ +/- 2 Standard deviations = 95%
+/- 3 Standard deviations = 99.7%

35
Q

Capacity vs competence
○ capacity is a ???term
competence is a ????term

A

medical

legal

36
Q

Always do this

A

• Avoid going to court
• Use trained medical interpreters when possible
• Committed mentally ill patients retain their rights
• Never abandon a patient
○ If a treatment (such as abortion, birth control, etc) is against a physician’s personal beliefs - that physician does not have to provide that treatment; however, they are responsible for referring their patient to a provider who is willing and able to provide such care
• Disclose all errors, regardless of harm

-If suspected abuse is occurring, physicians are mandated reporters and MUST report to Child Protective Services or Adult Protective Services

37
Q

○ 17-year-old girl whose parents cannot be contacted
§ ???
○ 17-year-old girl living on her own
§ ???
○ 17-year-old girl who is requests birth control
§ ??
○ 16-year-old girl refuses but mother consents
§ ???
○ 16-year-old girl consents but mother refuses
?????

A

○ 17-year-old girl whose parents cannot be contacted
§ physician may treat a threat to health underin locum parentis
○ 17-year-old girl living on her own
§ patient can choose whether or not to give consent
○ 17-year-old girl who is requests birth control
§ provide access even in absence of parental consent
○ 16-year-old girl refuses but mother consents
§ treat
○ 16-year-old girl consents but mother refuses
do not treat

38
Q

Case control

A

Observational
Compares the odds of being exposed between patients with disease and patients without the disease

eg Patients with cirrhosis are more likely to have been exposed to heavy alcohol use

OR = (a/b) / (c/d) = ad/bc

39
Q

Relative Risk(RR) is measure of disease association

A

Observational
○ asks, “How much more likely are you to get cirrhosis if you drink alcohol?”
RR = [a/(a+b)] / [c/(c+d)]

40
Q

Cross-Sectional Study

A

Observational
• Determines disease status and exposure/risk factor status at the same point in time
○ can show an association but not causality
measuresdisease prevalence

41
Q

Factorial design study

A

Randomizes patients into different interventions with 2 or more variables being studied in each intervention

42
Q

Crossover Study

A

• Participants alternate receiving intervention and placebo
• Participants act as own controls
○ improves power and precision of the study
all patients receive an intervention

43
Q

Meta-Analysis

A

• Combines datafrom multiple studies
○ better precision than individual studies
○ improves the generalizability of study findings
○ considered to be the highest level of clinical evidence
○ limited by:
§ quality of individual studies
bias in study selection

44
Q

Case series

A

• Report on observations of patients with known exposure or disease
Does not have comparison group so cannot perform hypothesis testing

45
Q 
1° (Primary prevention)
○ ???
§ e.g.,???
2° (Secondary prevention)
○ e???
§ e.g., ???
• 3° (Tertiary prevention)
○ re????t
e.g., ????
A 
1° (Primary prevention)
○ preventdisease occurrence
§ e.g.,vaccination
2° (Secondary prevention)
○ early detectionof disease to either prevent or decrease morbidity from disease before onset of symptoms
§ e.g., colonoscopy
• 3° (Tertiary prevention)
○ reduce morbidityfrom disease after symptom onset
e.g., medication
46
Q

Confounding
– A third factor is either positively or negatively associated with both the ???and ???
–Confounders arenot in the ????? pathway
— if not ????? for can distort true ???
either towards or away from the null hypothesis

A

Confounding
– A third factor is either positively or negatively associated with both the exposure and outcome
–Confounders arenot in the causal pathway
— if not adjusted for can distort true association
either towards or away from the null hypothesis

47
Q

• Selection bias

Nonrandom ????of study participants leads to ????conclusions

A

• Selection bias

Nonrandom selectionof study participants leads to erroneous conclusions

48
Q

• Measurement bias
○ Information is gathered in a way that distorts the information
§ ?????Effect
subjects ?????their ???when they ?????they are being ?????

A

• Measurement bias
○ Information is gathered in a way that distorts the information
§ Hawthorne Effect
subjects alter their behavior when they know they are being studied

49
Q

• Procedure bias

Different ???not treated the ???

A

• Procedure bias

Different groups not treated the same

50
Q

Pygmalion effect

A

nvestigator inadvertently conveys his high expectations to subjects, who then produce the expected result
A “self-fulfilling prophecy”

51
Q

Golem Effect

A

is the opposite pygmalion: study subjects decrease their performance to meet low expectations of investigator.

52
Q

Design bias??

A

The control group is inappropriately non-comparable to the intervention group

53
Q

Observer bias???

A

Investigator’s evaluation is impacted by knowledge of exposure statu

54
Q

Ways to Reduce Bias

A
  • Randomization
    • Use placebo as control
    • Blind studies
    • Crossover studies
55
Q

Randomizationassociation to ITT

A

intention-to-treat analysis is used in order to preserve randomization

56
Q

Examples of Effects that are Not Bias??

A
  • Effect modification
    • Latent period
    • Generalizability
57
Q

Crossover studies

A

> Subject acts as own control

>Limits confounding

58
Q

Level 1 level of evidence

A

Randomized Controlled Trial (and meta analysis

59
Q

Level 2 level of evidence

A

Prospective Cohort Study

60
Q

Level 3 level of evidence

A

Retrospective Cohort Study

Case-Control Study

61
Q

Level 4 level of evidence

A

Case Series

62
Q

Level 5 level of evidence

A
  1. Case Report(a report of a single case)
  2. Expert Opinion
  3. Personal Observation
  4. Review
63
Q

• SEM =???
○ SEM =??
○ SEM < σ
SEM ??as n ??

A

• SEM = standard error of the mean
○ SEM = σ/√n
○ SEM < σ
SEM decreases as n increases

64
Q 
• T-test
○ compares the means of ??
• ANOVA (analysis of variance)
○ compares the means of????
• χ2("chi-squared")
○ tests whether ??? variables are associated
○ used with 2x2 tables
e.g.,effect of treatment on disease
A

• T-test
○ compares the means of 2 groups on a continuous variable
• ANOVA (analysis of variance)
○ compares the means of 3 or more groups on a continuous variable
• χ2(“chi-squared”)
○ tests whether 2 nominal variables are associated
○ used with 2x2 tables
e.g.,effect of treatment on disease

65
Q

AR percent (ARP) is the attributable risk divided byincidence in the exposed (Ie)

A

ARP = (RR-1)/RR
○ ARP = 100* (Ie-Iu)/Ie =100*[a/(a+b) - c/(c+d)]/[a/(a+b)]
note thatrelative risk (RR) = Ie/Iu = a/(a+b) DIVIDED BY c/(c+d)
AR is incidence in the exposed (Ie) - incidence in the unexposed (Iu) = Ie - Iu
○ Ie = a/(a+b)
○ Iu = c/(c+d)
AR = a/(a+b) - c/(c+d)

66
Q

RCA??

A

○ a problem solving method thatfocuses on finding the cause (the root)of a medical error in order to identify preventative measureswhich are subsequently implemented

• RCA attempts to answer
○ what happened?
○ why did it occur?
○ how can we prevent this from occuring again?

67
Q

Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA)???

A

Definition: a technique used toevaluate risksin order to identify and eliminate known failure, potential failures, systemic, design, process, and service issues.

This technique isapplied toprevent medical errors from occuring in the first place

68
Q

What should you look for when suspecting selection bias?

A

Major discrepancy in sample size limiting generalizability. Such as observation group being 105 in one cohort and 35 in the other.

69
Q

Berkson bias

A

disease studies using only hospial based patient not applicabe to total populaition- selection bias

70
Q

Prevalence bias - Neyman bias

A

exposure happend long before disease assessmennt which resulted missed diesese in patients that die early or recover. - selection bias

71
Q

Attrition bias

A

significant loss in of study parciptatnts may cause bias if those lost to follow up differ significantly from remaining subjects.-selection bias

72
Q

Surveillance bias

A

Risk factor itself causes increased monitoring in exposed group relative to the unexposed group, which increased the probability of identifying disease - observational bias.

73
Q

Observational biases

A

Inaccurate measurement or classification of disease, exposure, or other variable

74
Q

Selection bias

A

Inappropiate selection or poor retention of study subjections

75
Q

Hazard Ratio

A

formula, the hazard ratio, which can be defined as the relative risk of an event happening at time t, is: λ(t) / λ0. A hazard ratio of 3 means that three times the number of events are seen in the treatment group at any point in time.

76
Q 
Absolute risk reduction 
????????
Relative Risk Reduction
???????
Relative Risk
???
Number needed to treat
?????
A 
Absolute risk reduction 
ARR: control rate-treatment rate
Relative Risk Reduction
RRR= ARR/control rate
Relative Risk
RR= treatment rate/control rate
Number needed to treat
NNT=1/ARR
77
Q

Positive likely hood ratio

A

LR(+)=sensitivity/1-specificity higher the better

78
Q

Negative Likely hood ratio

A

LR(-)=1-sensitivity/specificity less than 0.1 and lower is better

79
Q

Confounder effects&raquo_space;»»>and no associated with gradient..confounding can be reduced by ??????
Effect modifier only?????????? and is associated with a ??????, something ????usually revealed by stratification
​

A

Confounder effects both exposure and outcome and no associated with gradient..confounding can be reduced by randomization
Effect modifier only effects outcome and is associated with a gradient, something internal usually revealed by stratification
​

1 USMLE Step 3 Main one (37 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2024 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions