what are the justifications of a contract
principle of moral justification
principle of economic justification
what is paton’s quote on economic justification of contracts? [just rem the gist]
“Credit depends essentially on the ability to rely on the promises of others and can flourish only when there is a fully developed law of contract.”
What is the difference between interpretation and construction
Interpretation means the act of ascertaining the meaning of the language used.
Construction means the act of ascertaining the intention of the parties as expressed in the words used and its legal effect.
OR CONVERSELY
Interpretation = What do the words mean?
Construction = What did the parties mean legally by using these words? What is the legal consequence?
What are the two steps in the interpretation/construction of the contract?
What are theories of interpretation of contracts?
Literalism: literal meaning
Objectivism: reasonable person test
Subjectivism: intention of the parties
what are the rules in the interpretation of expressed/unexpressed/presumed intention?
express intention to be ascertained
unexpress intention to not be ascertained
presumed intention to be ascertained
What are the materials that the court has to consider while interpretation?
What are the kinds of implied terms [as per prof granwille willians]?
The terms that the parties had in mind but didn’t take the trouble to do so
The terms that the parties would have expressed if the question were posed in front of them
The terms that the parties would have expressed if they had foreseen the difficulty
What conditions are to be satisfied by the court while interpreting the implied terms?
in which case where these principles held?
Reasonable and equitable
Necessary to bring business efficacy of the contract
It should go without saying
Capable of clear expression
Should not violate any express terms
Case: B.P. Refinery (Westernport) Proprietary Limited v. The President Councillors and Ratepayers of the Shire of Hastings 1977
what is the most important factor for the courts to consider while considering implied terms?
necessity over reasonableness
The interpretation of contract is an _____
objective exercise
what is intention for the purpose of interpretation of the contract?
What is intention: For the purpose of the interpretation of
contracts, the intention of the parties is the meaning of the
contract. There is no intention independent of that meaning.
what is the difference between interpretation of statutes and interpretation of contracts?
statutes: question of law
contract: question of fact and law
in which case did lord hoffman decide teh principles of construction of contractual documents?
investers compensation society v. west bromwich building society
what is interpretation as per lord hoffman?
Interpretation is the ascertainment of the meaning which the document
would convey to a reasonable person having all the background
knowledge which would reasonably have been available to the parties in
the situation in which they were at the time of the contract
what is meant by matrix of fact as per lord wilberforce?
The background was famously referred to by Lord Wilberforce as the
“matrix of fact,” but this phrase is, if anything, an understated
description of what the background may include. Subject to the
requirement that it should have been reasonably available to the parties
and to the exception to be mentioned next, it includes absolutely anything
which would have affected the way in which the language of the
document would have been understood by a reasonable man.
what all is exlcuded form interpretation as per lord hoffman’s principles? what is the exception?
The law excludes from the admissible background the previous
negotiations of the parties and their declarations of subjective intent.
rectification
as per which article of the indian contract act uncertain agreements are void?
section 28
in interpretation, what would prevail - intention or the words?
interpretation
which act talks of rectification of contracts?
specific relief act section 26
what would prevail - meaning of the words or meaning of the document?
meaning of the document
what is the relevance of mannai co investments ltd v. eagle star life insurance?
the background may also help us to conclude that there were some errors and interpret them in to make sense of the contract
What did lord diplock assert in relation to interpretation of contratcs in the antaios compania neivera S.A v. Selen Rederierna?
General rule: no mistake has been made
However if a mistake has been made, the courts cannot give it illogical interpretation that the parties could not have intended.
what is known as piercing the semantic veil?
intention to prevail over the words if the words are ambiguous