Arguments

Question 1

Article 1

Answer 1

• This radical activity is crossing the line
• People are getting hurt by this conflict
• This conflict is constructed and exploited by political parties

Question 2

Article 2

Answer 2

A1: The Adani Project is devastating for the environment
A2: The politicians coordinating it are apathetic towards the ramifications
A3: Australians must take a stand

Question 3

Article 3

Answer 3

• The Adani mine can produce viable energy for the impoverished
• Australia needs to develop a position on coal mining
• Eventually, we will move to renewables so why not take advantage of cheaply produced coal energy now

Question 4

Article 4

Answer 4

• The Adani project will grant vulnerable people their livelihoods
• Palaszczuk doesn’t understand the hardships of the working class
• Palaszczuk is inept

Question 5

Article 5

Answer 5

• The mine goes against the world’s aspirations for lower carbon emissions
• The mine will be detrimental to the environment and diminish jobs
• The establishment of the mine is regressive for India, only assisting Mr Adani

Question 6

Article 6

Answer 6

• The Australian parliament is neglecting the voice of farmers
• A shift to renewable will, in fact, benefit farmers
• Farmers understand the importance of combating climate change because they are hit first

Question 7

Article 7

Answer 7

• There is no reason Adani would make a donation if the parties position was already established
• This is subject is not new
• McGrath’s reaction is farcical

Question 8

Article 8

Answer 8

• Michelle Landry empathetic argument is disingenuous
• Landry doesn’t care about India, only herself
• The Indian lower class will not benefit and have no involvement with Adani

Question 9

Article 9

Answer 9

• Further destruction of vulnerable, diverse life
• Politicians will do anything if it means they can make a profit
• The public needs to fight against this at all costs