What does article 8(1) state ?
That everyone has the right to respect for his private and family life, his home and correspondence
What are the four rights article 8(1) has
Finish the sentence. State interference with the right in 8(1) will require …
Any state interference with the right in 8(1) will require justification of one of the reasons listed in 8(2)
Summaries what article 8(2) states
There shall be no interference by a public authority with the exercise of this right except such as in accordance with the law and is necessary in a democratic society in the interests of national security , public safety or the economic well being of the country
What is meant by accordance with the law
This means that any interference with these rights must be based on a law that is clear and predictable. ie in COPLAND V UK surveillance of a persons work email was not justified as there was no law to base these action apron
What does article 8(2) meet ?
A legitimate aim ..
What is the list provided by 8(2) that considers what an legitimate aim is.
How is what is necessary in a democratic society decided ?
What section of article 8 comes under family life \?
8(1)
How does the ECHR define family life ?
The ECHR has defined family life to include different types of family relationships such as children , grandchildren, adoptive and foster relationship , relationships after divorce and oth4er relations with close ties married couples and co-habitating unmarried couples
What is a qualified right ?
Article 8 is a qualified right which means that it has to strike the balance between the rights of the individual and the community
- The state can limit these rights if it is in accordance with the law and if it meets a legitimate aim
What is the living instrument principle ?
What is controversial about removal from the state ?
It can cause problems specifically in immigration cases because one may be removed from the country ie
Agyarko and Ikuuga v secretary of state for the home department - there was no violation because courts didn’t see a reason why they couldn’t continue there relationship in there own countries
What case shows a removal from the state /
Agyarko and Ikuuga v secretary of state for the home department
Can the courts remove criminals ?
Yes but did not occur in the case of NASRI V FRANCE
What does the case of Botta V Italy include in the definition of a private life ?
A persons , physical and psychological integrity which includes there sex life , gender , reputation, name , images and personal data
List the potential interferences with private life under 8(2)
What case can be used to show police searches as a potential interference with private life ?
Gillian and Quinton uk
What case can be use to show personal data as a potential interference with private life ?
Axon v secretary of state for health - medical treatment for under 16s can be kept confidential in the name of Axon v secretary state for health
What case shows press intrusion as a potential interference with the right to a family life ?
Murray v express newspaper lc
What is the significance of the case of R on the application of f and thompson v sshd
What is meant by home under article 8(1)
Home is also known as
- where a person permanently lives
- where a person lives sometimes ie a second home Khantun v uk
- The workplace Niemietz v Germany
- where a caravan is parked lawfully is a home ie connors v uk
-
Which case suggests that a home can be the workplace ?
Niemietz v Germany
What is meant by correspondence ?
This means that if the state wants to interfere with phone calls , text messages, fax , letters they require justification under article 8(2).