Assault Flashcards

(16 cards)

1
Q

R v Ireland

A

The defendant must commit a positive act and not an omission

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

The defendant must commit a positive act and not an omission

A

R v Ireland

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

The victim must apprehend/fear unlawful physical force

A

R v Lamb

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

R v Lamb

A

The victim must apprehend/fear unlawful physical force

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Tuberville v savage

A

(If Applicable) Words can negate the threat

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

(If Applicable) Words can negate the threat

A

Tuberville v savage

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Smith v Chief Super Intendent of Woking Police Station

A

Threat of violence must be immediate (occurring at once) or imminent (about to happen)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Threat of violence must be immediate (occurring at once) or imminent (about to happen)

A

Smith v Chief Super Intendent of Woking Police Station

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Pagett

A

causation in fact - but for test

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Jordan

A

causation in law - significant cause

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

causation in fact - but for test

A

Pagett

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

causation in law - significant cause

A

Jordan

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Mohan

A

direct intention

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

direct intention

A

Mohan

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Cunningham

A

subjective recklessness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Subjective recklessness