Said the terms Anselm uses are
Ambiguous (vague) and has too much intellectual arrogance
what did Aquinas reject
the assumption that weak human intellect alone can prove God’s existence
what did he say Anselm was guilty of
Making a transitional error - moving from definition of God to the existence of God
what does Anselm make assumptions about
The definition of God that is no necessarily shared by all believers
understanding the meaning of God mean what
That God only exists in the understanding, not in reality