Evidence Law
DEFINITION
Body of law we have to
- regulate,
- restrict, and
- assign weight to info
Evidence Law
6 CONSIDERATIONS
- Relevance
- Fairness
- Strengths and limitations of juries
- Efficiency
- Social policies
- Historical anomalous doctrines
When do FRE (other than privilege) not apply?
- Grand jury
- Evidentiary hearing
- Certain other miscellaneous proceedings (including those involving
- sentencing,
- extradition,
- bail, and
- probation)
RULE 1101
Evidentiary hearing
DEFINITION
Court’s determination on a preliminary question of fact governing admissibility
How should FRE be construed?
So as to
- Administer every proceeding fairly,
- Eliminate unjustifiable expense and delay, and
- Promote the development of evidence law
To the end of ascertaining the truth and securing a just determination
RULE 102
When do FRE apply?
All civil and criminal cases in
- US courts of appeal
- US district courts
- US court of claims
- US bankruptcy courts
- US admiralty courts
- US proceedings before US magistrates
RULE 101
What is RULE 103 for?
rulings on evidence
What is RULE 105 for?
limiting evidence that is not admissible against other parties or for other purposes
Rule of Completeness
RULE 106
- If a party introduces all or part of a writing or recorded statement,
- an adverse party may require the introduction
- at that time of
- any other part OR
- any other writing or recorded statement
- that in fairness ought to be considered at the same time
What is RULE 104(a) for?
preliminary questions in general
What is RULE 104(b) for?
relevance that depends on a fact
Condition relevance
DEFINITION
relevance that depends on a fact
How does a court treat preliminary questions?
- The court must decide any preliminary question about
a. Whether a witness is qualified
b. A privilege exists, or
c. Evidence is admissible - In so deciding, the court is not bound by evidence rules
Except those on privilege
RULE 104(a)
How does a court treat conditional relevance?
- When relevance of evidence depends on whether a fact exists = proof must introduced sufficient to support a finding that the fact does exist
- The court may admit the proposed evidence on the condition that the proof be introduced later
RULE 104(b)
Who has responsibility for evidentiary compliance?
the advocates
Objection
REQUIREMENTS + CONSEQUENCES
Must be
- timely
- specific
Otherwise = objection may be waived
What is the effect of a failure to object?
often means the issue is waived
What do you do if you believe the court has improperly excluded evidence?
Make an offer of proof to preserve the issue on appeal
Offer of proof
Put on the record what evidence would have been offered
Standards of Review
- Abuse of discretion
- Harmless error
- Plain error
Abuse of discretion standard
- An appellate court might disagree with the decision a trial judge made,
- but will not grant relief
- UNLESS the judge’s decision
1. was based on
a. A clearly erroneous finding of fact or
b. An erroneous conclusion of law or
2. Manifested a clear error in judgment
Harmless error rule
An appellate court will grant relief ONLY for
- evidentiary errors
- that affect the substantial rights
- of the parties
Plain error rule
Allows an appellate court to provide relief where the parties failed to bring a proper objection ONLY IF
1. The error affects a substantial right
2. The error is clear from the record AND
3. The error is one that would affect the
a. fairness,
b. integrity, or
c. public reputation
of judicial proceedings if left uncorrected
If a party fails to object, what standard of review will the appellate court likely use?
Plain error rule
