What are the standards for responsible caring & maximizing benefits?
! II.8: provide coordinated services.
- avoid duplication or working at cross purposes.
2. II.9 record should support continued and coordinated care.
3. II.20: be aware of the knowledge and skills of other disciplines and advise the use of such knowledge and skills where relevant.
4. II.21: strive to provide and obtain services.
- may include recommending professionals other than psychologists.
What is counselling?
What are the requirements for counselling psychology and what is it?
What are the differences and similarities between counselling psych & clinical psych?
Clinical vs. Counseling
* Distinction becoming less meaningful?
* Not according to the College of Psychologists of BC
* Both may be trained in diagnosis and evidence-based practice, and both may work with psychopathology in a range of settings.
* Training programs differ.
* Counseling often within education, clinical within psych.
* Counseling = more career and vocational services
* Research focus often differs.
* clinical= psychopathology, clinical child and adolescent psychology, clinical health psychology
* counseling= minority/ cross-cultural issues, academic/ vocational issues
* Biggest distinction = the severity
o Clinical; more severe cases / more intensive
o Counseling; more day-to-day issues
What is school psychology?
What are Therapists and psychotherapists
What do psychiatrists do, and how do you become one?
Psychiatry vs. clinical psychologists
What are the differences in consultation between psychiatrists and clinical psychologists?
Consultation
* Goal = Increase the effectiveness by sharing expertise
* Remedial or preventative
* Clinical consultation:
* Providing information, advice, and recommendations about how best to assess, understand, or treat a client.
* Specific to one client or general to group
* Organizational consultation
* Developing prevention or intervention programs, evaluating service provision, or providing opinions on health care policies etc.,
* Includes legal consultation.
Clinical consultation- an ethical imperative
* In multidisciplinary teams
* With Other psychologists
* Regarding competence (standard II.8), objectivity, dual relationships (standard III.34), ethical issues (iii.38, iv. 18)
* Draw on expertise, the difference in perspective.
* With employees’ supervisees students and trainees (standard ii.25)
* With other professional
* With community members
* If concerned with cultural competence (standard ii.21).
Organizational consultation
* Needs assessment.
* Determine the extent of unmet health needs in the identified population.
* Program development
* Program evaluation
* Policy consultation
* With specific agency
* With government
What counts as clinical supervision?
what kind of training can you do as a RCP? and what respective standards are there?
Training
* Train other mental health professions
* Orientations
* Skills training
* Providing consultations
* Train staff at your own practice
* Extended responsibility (standards, I.46-I.47, II.49-II.50, III.39-III.40)
* Everyone working under/with you must follow ethical guidelines
Relevant ethical standards
* Instruction should be current and scholarly (ii.24)
* Facilitate development by:
* Ensuring that students understand ethics
* Providing timely evaluations and constructive consultation and experience opportunities (Standard II.25)
* Encourage and assist in the publication of worthy papers (standard ii.26)
* Give proportionate credit for work/ ideas contributed by others (including students; standard III.37).
What are the two pillars of psych?
Science & Ethics
Science
* Use research evidence whenever available
* If not available, use a scientific frame of mind
* Systematic
* Questioning
* Self-critical
* Monitor effects\
* Formulate and test hypotheses
* Beware intuition
Ethics
* Why do we need ethical guidelines?
* Numerberg; a place in Germany where they ran unethical experiments, e.g., torture, etc., so they set out guidelines of ethics.
* Set out guidelines for professional practice.
* Important to question one’s actions/ services
* Evidence
* Potential risks and benefits
When was the code of ethics developed and by whom?
Canadian Code of Ethics
* Not developed until the 1980s
* Developed from analysis of the literature
* Incorporated knowledge of Canadian psychologists
* Includes an explicit model of ethical decision-making
* Differential weighting of ethical principles
* Respect for dignity
* Responsible caring
* Integrity in relationships
* Responsibility to society
What are the steps of ethical decision making?
Steps of ethical decision making
1. Identify the individual and groups potentially affected
2. Identify ethically relevant issues and practices, including the interest, rights, and characteristics of those individuals involved and the system/ circumstance in which the issue arose
3. Consider how personal biases, stresses, or self-interest might influence development/choice of action.
4. Develop alternative courses of action.
5. Analyze likely risks and benefits of each course of action on all involved/likely to be affected.
6. Choose a course of action after considering principles, values, and standards.
7. Act and assume responsibility for actions.
8. Evaluate results.
9. Assume responsibility for consequences, including correcting negative consequences or re-engaging in ethical decision making.
10. Act appropriately to prevent future occurrences of the dilemma.
Why do we classify/ categorize? And what are two things to consider when doing so?
Why do we need to define what’s “normal”?
Why is it hard to define “abnormal behavior”?
What are Different Definitions of Abnormal Behavior?
what does Satisfactory Infrequency or Violation of Social Norms mean?
What are norms influenced by?
Values, Experiences
- Personal, cultural, and professional values can influence definition of abnormal.
- Can include beliefs based on theoretical models.
o E.g., belief that newborns don’t experience pain, that children don’t experience depression.
- Professional Relativity.
o What we see as abnormal may depend on our professional context.
- Incredibly important to base definitions on scientific evidence.
what does subjective distress mean?
How much distress is too much?
Disability, dysfunction, or impairment
- Abnormal if it causes social (interpersonal) or occupational/ educational problems.
- Pros:
o Often requires little inference.
o Problems often prompt people to seek treatment.
- Cons: who defines dysfunction?
o Impairment is relative.
- Hard to agree on “adequate” level of functioning.
Abnormal Behavior vs. Mental Disorder
How does the dsm-5 define mental disorder?
DSM- 5 Definition of a Mental Disorder.
- Syndrome characterized by clinically significant disturbance in cognition, emotion regulation, or behavior.
- Reflects dysfunction in psychological, biological, or developmental processes underlying normal functioning.
- Usually associated with significant distress or disability in social. Occupational, or other important activities.
o Harmful dysfunction
- Distress and/ or impairment.