What is Baddeley and Hitch’s (1974) Working Memory Model?
- an explanation of how the short-term memory is organised and how it functions
What is the central executive?
What is the phonological loop?
What is the visuo-spatial sketchpad?
What is the episodic buffer?
What are the strengths of the working memory model?
What are the weaknesses of the working memory model?
How does the case of KF support separate STM stores?
Shallice and Warrington (1970) carried out a case study of patient KF who had brain damage. He had poor STM ability for verbal information but could process visual information normally (difficulty with sounds but could recall letters/digits).
So his phonological loop had been damaged but other areas of memory were intact. This suggests there are separate visual and acoustic stores.
However, evidence from brain-damaged patients may be unreliable because it concerns unique cases of patients who have had traumatic experiences.
How do dual task performance studies support the VSS?
Baddeley et al. (1975) found participants had more difficulty doing two visual tasks (tracking a light and describing the letter F) than doing a visual and verbal task at the same time.
The greater difficulty is because both visual tasks compete for the same limited resources. When doing a verbal and visual task simultaneously, there is no competition.
Therefore dual task performance activity provides evidence for the existence of the visuo-spatial sketchpad. The multi-store model of memory can’t explain this.
How does the word length effect support the phonological loop?
Baddeley et al. (1975) found people have more difficulty remembering a list of long words (e.g. ‘association’) than short words. This is the word length effect.
This is because there is limited space for rehearsal in the articulatory process (probably about two seconds).
Word length effect disappears if a person is given a repetitive task tying up the articulatory process, demonstrating the process at work.
How is the model supported by brain scanning studies?
Braver et al.’s (1997) participants did tasks involving the central executive while they were having a brain scan. Activity seen in the prefrontal cortex.
Activity in this area increased as the task became harder. This makes sense in terms of the working memory model: as demands on the central executive increase, it has to work harder to fulfil its functions.
So this study provides evidence that the central executive may have a physical reality in the brain.
Why is there a lack of clarity over the central executive?
Cognitive psychologists suggest that the central executive is unsatisfactory and doesn’t really explain anything.
The central executive should be more clearly specified than just being simple ‘attention’. Some psychologists believe it may consist of separate components. Additionally, the capacity of the central executive has never been measured.
This means that the working memory model hasn’t been fully explained.
Why is the working memory model implying that all spatial information was first visual a weakness?
Lieberman (1980) criticizes the working memory model as the visuo-spatial sketch pad implies that all spatial information was first visual (they are linked).
However, Liebermann points out that blind people have excellent spatial awareness, although they have never had any visual information. Leiberman argues that the VSS should be separated into two different components: one for visual information and one for spatial.
Aim
Baddeley and Hitch (1976) Working Memory Model
To investigate if participants can use different parts of working memory at the same time.
Procedure
Baddeley and Hitch (1976) Working Memory Model
Conducted an experiment in which participants were asked to perform two tasks at the same time (dual task technique) - a digital span task which required them to repeat a list of numbers, and a verbal reasoning task which required them to answer true or false to various questions.
Results
Baddeley and Hitch (1976) Working Memory Model
As the number of digits increased in the digit span tasks, participants took longer to answer the reasoning questions, but not much longer - only fractions of a second. And, they didn’t make any more errors in the verbal reasoning tasks as the number of digits increase.
Conclusion
Baddeley and Hitch (1976) Working Memory Model
The verbal reasoning task made use of the central executive and the digit span task made use of the phonological loop. Therefore different parts of the working memory can be used at the same time.