Operant Conditioning as an Explanation of Human Behaviour (P1) - Intro, Reinforcement
AO3 ‹+› Skinner (S.E) used his operant conditioning chambers which showed that rewarding an animal’s behaviour will strengthen the behaviour, rats press lever to get more food pellets, done in a controlled, laboratory setting, increases internal validity of the findings into learning behaviour in animals
AO3 ‹-› cannot generalise studies on animal to humans (different anatomy and physiology, cannot communicate in the same way), findings from Skinner using rats and pigeons may be less generalisable to humans and the processes involved in learning
Operant Conditioning as an Explanation of Human Behaviour (P2) - Punishment
AO3 ‹+› Nasa et al (S.E) found that behaviour shaping was successful in supporting a child (11 yrs old) with ADHD to concentrate on tasks, demonstrates U.A of positive reinforcement (O.P) in society, supports children developing skills which can aid their learning in the classroom
AO3 ‹-› behaviour shaping is only the manipulation of surface behaviour, individuals encourage a behaviour they think is socially acceptable (could be viewed as a form of social control), ethical implications if this is misused (particularly with young children and vulnerable people - more impressionable), doesn’t address root cause as it could be a coping mechanism
Operant Conditioning as an Explanation for Human Behaviour (Conclusion)
AO3 ‹+› more scientific, focuses on studying outward, observable behaviour, not concerned with internal, mental processes than cannot be directly measured, findings more valid as objective measurements of behaviour as used
AO3 ‹-› reduced the complex human behaviour of learning to learning through consequences, underestimated the role of biological factors (genetics, instincts), fails to account for unobservable behaviours (mental/emotional experiences), limited and oversimplified explanation for a theory of learning
Behaviour Modification (AO1)