What does the predictive coding model of perception state?
The brain continually generates models of the world based on context and information from memory to predict sensory input
What is bottom-up processing?
Information coming in from the world goes through multiple levels of processing to “make sense of it” by integrating it with prior knowledge
What is top-down processing?
The use of context and general knowledge to understand and interpret sensory perceptions
What are priors?
Hypotheses about how likely things are in general and how likely they are to be true in the current situation
What is the problem of perception?
What is feedforward processing? Name a feedforward feature based model.
Sensory information encoded in early sensory areas is relayed from one node to the next; populations of neurons at each level respond to features of objects at an increasingly large scale and higher levels of abstraction
ie, information comes in, moving from basic sensory areas to high level integration areas of the cortex
How does the brain decide which hypothesis/interpretation to apply to patterns of lower level features that are detected?
Integration of top-down information; ie, information generated by the brain to apply to the world
What does a predictive coding model do? (3 steps)
How do predictive coding models view the role of visual cortex neurons?
What is the brain’s task in perception, according to the predictive coding model?
To predict the hidden cause out in the world of what we are perceiving
What are the 4 steps (levels) of the predicting coding model?
What are representational units in predictive coding?
Units at each level of the predictive coding model that encode expectation (the probability of a given stimulus under the circumstances, ie conditional probability); these units send predictions to the next lower level
What are error units in predictive coding?
Units at each level of the predictive coding model that encode or read surprise (the mismatch between predictions and bottom up sensory evidence); sent forward to the next higher level, where expectations are adjusted or sent up to the next level
How is prediction error generated and what does it do?
If error units send signals forward to the next higher level and there is a mismatch, prediction error is generated
The prediction error moves up the hierarchy, causing revision of hypotheses at the level above; if that level can’t minimize the prediction error, it is pushed up to the next level
Higher level = more substantial revision
When minimized, the winning hypotheses forms the contents of perception
What did the Egner & Summerfield paper test?
Predictions stemming from predictive coding models against feature based models of object perception in the ventral stram
What was the big picture question (Egner &Summerfield)?
Does predictive coding explain visual object recognition better than classic hierarchical feature-based models?
What brain mapping knowledge did they leverage to answer a more focused question (Egner & Summerfield)?
What are the two views of visual perception (background, Egner & Summerfield)?
What is the research question and their hypothesis (Egner & Summerfield)?
RQ: Does BOLD activity in the FFA reflect responses to expectation and surprise, or just face features?
General H (predictive coding): FFA responses to faces and houses should be most different when face expectation is low
Alternative H (feature detection): there will always be more FFA activation to faces than to houses, regardless of expectation
What were the IV and DV (Egner & Summerfield)?
IV: stimulus probability (% of time, face vs. house); stimulus feature (face/house); target vs. nontarget
DV: reaction time. BOLD response in FFA and PPA
How did they manipulate expectation (Egner & Summerfield)?
Participants were told that different coloured frames meant different likelihoods that a face would appear
How did they keep attentional demands constant across conditions to avoid differences in attention being a confound?
They included upside-down faces (allows response to be to what you actually see rather than what you expect to see)
What condition represents the error signal in Egner & Summerfield?
FFA activation reflecting surprise - surprise requires error signal to be sent up for adjustment
Did Egner & Summerfield find that expectation and surprise contribute equally to the FFA population response?
In the PC model that fit best, surprise contributed 2x as much as expectation