Session 10 Flashcards

(14 cards)

1
Q

Define epistemic bubble

A

Social structure where relevant voices have been left out

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Define echo chamber

A

Social structure where relevant voices have been actively excluded and discredited through the manipulation of trust

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Explain bootstrapped corroboration

A

When members of an epistemic bubbles increase self confidence due to agreement with selected peers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Explain evidential pre-emption

A

Process where an echo chamber predicts contrary testimony from outsiders

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Explain a reverse Mandevillian intelligence

A

A social epistemic structure that means that some epistemic vices in individuals might actually make groups less epistemically successful

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Explain the method used to break out of echo chambers

A

Social epistemic reboot:

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Define “Epistemic Peer”

A

Person you judge as likely as you to provide the correct answer to a question.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Define “fake news”

A

Lack of truth (false) and lack of truthfulness (intent to deceive)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Difference between a liar and a bullshitter

A

Liar believes their statement is false
Bullshitter does not care if their statements are true or false

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Why is bullshitting considered more problematic than lying?

A

Requires no knowledge
Psychologically easier

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Explain the two types of research

A

Deep research: first order evidence, typically requires expertise
Shallow research: well-credentialed sources, guided by deference to experts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

‘Post truth’ take 1 for why claims are no longer subject to the standard of truth

A

Support based on emotion, attention grabbing, protest or a desire to belong -> regardless of truth value
Truth isn’t the primary goal of communication

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Explain “Take 2A”

A

Sincerity > Accuracy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Explain ‘Take 2B’

A

Subjectivism > objectivism
If one believes p, then it is the case that p.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly