In Basket
1. Issues
2. Actions
3. Why? Effect on Department/ Community
ITEM 1
1. Issues
A. Officer- Blatant racism, Violation of our Bias Free Policing Policy
B. Sgt- inability or unwillingness to intervene/ take action
2. Actions
A. Immediately notify Chief of incident
B. Place Officer Hanley and Sgt. Voto on Admin leave.
C. Reach out to victim, let him know we are aware of the incident and are taking the proper action to correct the issue
D. Report incident to POST
E. Recommend an extended suspension or even demotion for Sgt
F. Recommend termination for Officer
3. Why?
A. Marshfield PD has Zero Tolerance for racism and it won’t be allowed here. Both he vile behavior of the officer and the inaction of the Sgt. Are serious threats to the integrity of this department, and could make the public question or commitment to provide impartial and Bias Free service to them.
ITEM 2
1. Issues
A. Lying, stealing
2. Actions
A. Initiate internal and possibly criminal investigation
B. Place Officer on Admin leave pending the results of these investigations
C. Gather evidence including detail slip and video
D. Interview Officer. Document everything and report it up the chain of command
E. Report to POST- Unprofessional conduct and criminal conduct
F. Recommend decertification and termination
3. Why?
A. Any officer willing to sacrifice his honor and credibility for an hour of overtime can’t be trusted to make the serious and consequential decisions a police officer is required to make. We have Zero Tolerance for lying and stealing in this department, so an officer who exhibits these behaviors no longer has any business continuing in this profession.
ITEM 3
1. Issues
A. Lying, Stealing
2. Actions
A. Compile documentation of all tickets written at incorrect times. Review other times officer has worked click it or ticket grants and compile same.
3. B. Interview the officer and have him document his explanation in a written statement
c. Place Officer and admin leave pending and internal investigation and criminal investigations.
d. Report to POST
e. Recommend Termination, de-certification
f. Reach out to reporting party and inform her we are investigating the complaint and will take proper action to correct the situation
3. Why?
a. Marshfield PD has Zero tolerance for Lying or Stealing. A Police officer is required to make decisions, write reports, testify in court and expected to do all of these things with the utmost honesty, accuracy, and integrity. If an officer is willing to lie, forge information, and steal grant money to make a 4 hours traffic block easier for him, there is no way he can be trusted to serve the public with honesty and truthfulness.
ITEM 4
1. Issues
* Improper handling of First Amendment Audit
2. Actions
* Verbal warning to officer, and counsel him as to the proper way to interact with First amendment auditors. Allow them to peacefully record, provide basic information such as name and badge number
* Written warning to Sgt, and counseling. As a Supervisor, Sgt. Jop is expected to know what to do in these situations and respond appropriately.
* Department wide re-training on encounters with First Amendment Auditors.
*
3. Issues
A. Unwillingness to provide required information to the public jeopardizes the department's image in relation to our commitment to transparency. By dealing with First Amendment Auditors professionally and appropriately, we can use their presence to our benefit, and actually increase our own legitimacy and the trust that the public instills in us.
Item 5
1. Issues
* Violation of Social Media Policy
* Hate Speech
2. Actions
* Initiate an internal investigation
* Require the Officer to provide the department with access to their social media account, per department policy.
* Place on Administrative leave
* Report to POST
* Recommend Termination and De-Certification
*
3. Why?
*
A. Posting in this manner discredits the officer, the department, and has the corresponding effect of reducing public confidence and trust in out organization.
B. Threats or perceived threats to citizens of the officer's own community, specifically targeting a certain socio-economic demographic of the population, is completely unacceptable and the involved officer is not suitable to continue a career in law enforcement
Item 6
1. Issues
* Sexual Harassment- Violation of policy
* Possible Criminal- Indecent
2. Action
* Initiate an internal investigation.
B. Speak with Ms. Preston. Advise her that I am aware on the incident and will be investigating. Also inform her that I know she wanted this kept confidential, but I'm a mandatory reporter and this needs to be documented and reported up the chain of command. Offer her couseling opportunities and resources to cope with this situation.
C. Speak with Lt. Williams and hear his explanation. Have him write a written statement in regard to his behavior.
D. Place Lt. Williams on Administrative leave, and Order him to have no further contact with Ms. Preston until the investigation is concluded.
E. If Lt. Williams returns to work, recommend he be reassigned to the 4-12 shift to avoid contact with the front desk clerk.
3. Why?
A. Lt. Williams repeated sexual advances are completely out of line, and certainly not acceptable in our department. Lt. Williams is creating a hostile working environment for Ms. Preston, so immediate action is necessary to put an end to this behavior. I wouldn't want to work in a place where this kind of abuse of power is condone, and Ms. Preston shouldn't have to deal with that in her workplace.
*