What are the best practices for earthquake modeling? (1-4)
What are the best practices for earthquake modeling? (5-7)
What are the 5 key principles for managing earthquake exposure?
1) Risk management
2) Data management
3) Models
4) PML (Probable Maximum Loss)
5) Financial resources and contingency plan
What is the broad 3-point plan for managing earthquake exposure?
Briefly describe the key principle of RISK MANAGEMENT for EQ exposure.
EQ exposure Risk Management policies are SUBJECT TO OVERSIGHT by the Board of Directors and IMPLEMENTED by senior management.
Briefly describe the key principle of DATA MANAGEMENT for EQ exposure.
- must address the INTEGRITY, VERIFICATION, LIMITATIONS
Briefly describe the key principle of MODELING for EQ exposure.
One must understand the assumptions, the methods, and the limitations of the EQ models.
Briefly describe the key principle of PML (Probable Maximum Loss) for EQ exposure.
PML = Total Expected Ultimate Cost
- includes considerations for data quality, non-modeled exposure, model uncertainty, and multi-region exposure
Briefly describe the key principle for FINANCIAL RESOURCES & CONTINGENCY PLAN for EQ exposure.
Identify uses of EQ models aside from PML (probable Maximum Loss) calculation. (2)
- monitor exposure accumulation
What are sound practices for EQ model VERSION? (4)
What are sound practices for EQ model VALIDATION? (3)
How might management adjust for low data quality in an EQ PML (Probable Maximum Loss) estimate?
They may add a margin of safety to the PML estimate (though, this is not an excuse to ignore the data quality).
Identify non-modeled exposures when calculating the PML (Probable Maximum Loss). (4)
Identify 2 examples of model uncertainty.
How might management adjust for model uncertainty in an EQ PML (Probable Maximum Loss) estimate?
They may add a margin of safety to the PML estimate.
Regarding multi-region exposures, identify disadvantages of using the maximum of BC & QC exposures. (2)
How should PMLs (Probable Maximum Loss) be reported for Canadian versus foreign insurers with exposure outside the of Canada?
BoD (Board of Directors), Senior management would report the PMLs to OSFI as follows:
Identify financial resources for covering PML for EQ exposure. (4)
Identify a restrictive condition on EQ exposure financial resources for: reinsurance coverage.
When including a non-CAT reinsurance, one must consider the ‘per event’ limits and other events exhausting the coverage.
Identify a restrictive condition on EQ exposure financial resources for: capital market financing.
OSFI prior approval is required before recognition as a financial resource (under MCT guidelines).
How is a particular insurer’s EQ risk management program failing the key principles? (3)
A PandC insurance company is exposed to EQ risk through it’s operations in BC; however, it has struggled with finding an accurate and consistent way of quantifying this risk. Several measures, including PML, have been used, but the results have varied significantly from one year to the next. This concerns senior management, as they are unsure that the company’s financial resources would be sufficient in the event of a severe EQ.
DATA: may be thin since Canadian EQ events are rare
MODEL: may not have sufficient understanding of the assumptions, methods and limitations of the models
PML (Probable Maximum Loss): may not be considering non-modeled exposures
Identify ways to improve risk estimation & CAT risk management for a particular insurer? (4)
A property and casualty insurance company provides earthquake insurance to their insureds
and considers purchasing a catastrophe treaty. However, it has struggled with finding an
accurate way of quantifying earthquake risk. Earthquake simulation model results show that
the probability of a catastrophic event is extremely low.
What are OSFI’s EQ exposure reporting requirements?
- if no material exposure, then submit a letter stating so