Session 6 Flashcards

(8 cards)

1
Q

Science vs. Pseudo-science:

A

Science uses systematic methods of observation, testing, and evidence to form and revise theories that can be proven false (falsifiable).
Pseudo-science imitates science but lacks proper testing, evidence, or falsifiability — it cannot be reliably confirmed or disproven.
Example:
Physics is science, while astrology is pseudo-science, because astrology’s claims can’t be rigorously tested or falsified.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Verificationism

A

A theory from logical positivism (early 20th century).
Main idea: A statement is meaningful only if it can be verified by experience or observation.
Example:
Water boils at 100°C” → meaningful (can be tested).
God exists” → meaningless (cannot be verified empirically).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Falsificationism

A

Science progresses by falsifying (disproving) theories, not by verifying them.

A theory is scientific only if it can, in principle, be proven false.

Example: “All swans are white” → scientific (can be falsified by one black swan).

Good science makes risky predictions that could be wrong.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Concept of inductive strength.

A

Definition:
An inductive argument is strong if its premises make the conclusion very likely to be true — though not certain.
Deductive arguments = aim for certainty.

Inductive arguments = aim for probability.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

statistical arguments

A

Definition:
A statistical argument is an inductive argument that uses numerical data or probabilities to support a conclusion.
It claims something is likely true based on statistics or sample evidence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Inference to the Best Explanation

A

Definition:
An argument form where we infer that the best explanation for certain facts or observations is probably true.
It’s also called “abductive reasoning.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Defeaters in inductive arguments.

A

Definition:
A defeater is new information that weakens or overturns an inductive argument.
Because inductive arguments are based on probability, they can be defeated by new evidence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Explanation: DN model of explanation/mechanistic model of explanation & Coleman’s boat.

A

Definition:
A scientific explanation that deductively derives an event from general laws and initial conditions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly