Expansion of the Universe leads naturally too?
What does the big bang theory not explain?
how the initial conditions came to be.
Observational Evidence for the Big Bang Theory
Hot plasma in early universe
free electrons interact strongly with light
→ opaque, no light escapes
Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation
electromatic radiation emmited from opaque universe 400,000 years old.
Why is CMB important
Inflation
Neutrons stability
not stable unless bound in a nucleus (and sometimes not even then)
The earliest stages of the universe
extremely high temperature 10-43s
Planck Era
- Energies of individual particles warp spacetime into a “quantum foam”
Rapid growth
Formation of nuclei
t~0.001s
Era of Nucleosynthesis
- 25% of particles fuse into He
Imagine an alternate universe which cooled a bit
faster than our own. How much helium would
have formed in this universe?
Shorter cooling → less neutrons decay → more neutrons
available to make helium
=more helium
Imagine an alternate universe which cooled a bit
faster than our own. How much helium would
have formed in this universe?
Shorter cooling → less neutrons decay → more neutrons
available to make helium
=more helium
Why are heavier elements not produced around the time of the big bang?
Isotropic
Same in all directions (no preferred direction)
Homogenous
all places are alike (galaxies in one place are similar to another place)
Is our universe isotropic or homogeneous?
both
Flat or curved universe?
flat over large scales
CMB redshift
The CMB photons have been redshifted by ~1000x (now
appear cold at T~3K but T~3000K initially)
era of galaxies
t=50-600 million years
Why can’t current theories describe what happened during the Planck era?
We do not yet have a theory that links quantum
mechanics and general relativity
Particle era
(10-3 sec) “quark soup”