Critical Evaluation
Critical Evaluation Includes
Data Advocacy
Data Gathering
Knowing what is considered sufficient, credible, and objective evidence and where to find it
Data Analysis
Being able to organize data so it reveals patterns and to analyze it to detect local relationships
EBDM
Ability to apply the results of data gathering and analysis to make better business decisions
Effective Data Advocates
Six Steps in Evidence-Based Decision Making
Ask Step in Evidence-Based Decision Making
When there is a problem, translate the solution into a question that can be answered through data gathering.
Acquire Step in Evidence-Based Decision Making
Gather data from varied sources
Appraise Step in Evidence-Based Decision Making
Determine if evidence gathered is relevant, valid, reliable, accurate, complete and unbiased
Aggregate Step in Evidence-Based Decision Making
Apply Step in Evidence-Based Decision Making
Assess Step in Evidence-Based Decision Making
Monitor the solution that has been implemented and objectively measure the extent the objectives have been attained.
Become and HR Data Advocate
Quantitative data
Objective measurements that can be verified and used in statistical analysis
Qualitative data
Qualitative data can be made by
Third Party Observer Self-Assessments
Which type of data (qualitative or quantitative) is more important to HR professionals? How is one determined?
Assessing Validity of Data Sources (data not in-house)
Reasons of Interviews
Purpose of interviews
Why are interviews typically not the sole form of gathering data
Due to time and labor to construct them.
When they are multiple interviewers being used
All interviewers must be carefully trained and prepared so that all interviews are conducted in same manner without bias