Exclusion Clauses Flashcards

(39 cards)

1
Q

What is an exclusion clause?

A

A term that seeks to limit or exclude liability.
## Footnote
Often used to restrict refunds or responsibility.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are common examples of exclusion clauses?

A

No refunds clauses and clauses excluding liability for injury or death.
## Footnote
These are closely regulated by law.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are the three main areas of control for exclusion clauses?

A

Incorporation, contra proferentem, and statutory control.
## Footnote
All three must be satisfied.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the first question courts ask about an exclusion clause?

A

Whether the clause is a term of the contract.
## Footnote
This depends on incorporation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What case shows that onerous exclusion clauses require clear notice?

A

Thornton v Shoe Lane Parking.
## Footnote
The more onerous the clause, the clearer the notice required.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What case establishes that signed documents incorporate terms?

A

L’Estrange v Graucob.
## Footnote
Applies even if the term was not read.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is an exception to L’Estrange v Graucob for onerous terms?

A

Onerous terms must be specifically brought to attention.
## Footnote
Harsh clauses need clear notice.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Which case illustrates the onerous terms exception?

A

Interfoto v Stiletto.
## Footnote
Failure to highlight onerous terms prevented incorporation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What document limitation applies to incorporation of exclusion clauses?

A

The document must be a genuine contractual document.
## Footnote
Receipts usually do not qualify.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Which case confirms this document limitation?

A

Grogan v Robin Meredith.
## Footnote
Non-contractual documents cannot incorporate terms.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What happens if verbal assurances contradict a written exclusion clause?

A

The verbal assurance overrides the written term.
## Footnote
The exclusion clause will not apply.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Which case illustrates verbal assurances overriding written terms?

A

Curtis v Chemical Cleaning.
## Footnote
Misleading explanation invalidated the exclusion clause.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

When are exclusion clauses not written into the contract incorporated?

A

When reasonable notice is given.
## Footnote
Clarity and timing are key.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Which case shows unclear notices will not incorporate exclusion clauses?

A

Chapelton v Barry UDC.
## Footnote
The document was not clearly contractual.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Which case shows clear reference can incorporate exclusion clauses?

A

Parker v South Eastern Railway.
## Footnote
Clear notice allowed incorporation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Which case shows reasonable steps can incorporate exclusion clauses?

A

O’Brien v MGN.
## Footnote
Reasonable steps made terms binding.

17
Q

How can exclusion clauses be incorporated through course of dealings?

A

Through regular and consistent prior transactions.
## Footnote
Frequency and consistency are required.

18
Q

Which case shows infrequent dealings are insufficient?

A

Hollier v Rambler Motors.
## Footnote
3–4 dealings in 5 years was not enough.

19
Q

Which case shows regular B2B dealings can incorporate clauses?

A

Spurling v Bradshaw.
## Footnote
Consistent written contracts supported incorporation.

20
Q

What is contra proferentem?

A

Interpreting ambiguous clauses against the party relying on them.
## Footnote
Protects the weaker party.

21
Q

When will contra proferentem apply?

A

When an exclusion clause is vague or unclear.
## Footnote
Courts rule against the clause’s drafter.

22
Q

Which case applied contra proferentem to favour consumers?

A

Hollier v Rambler Motors.
## Footnote
The consumer was the weaker party.

23
Q

Which case shows clear and agreed exclusion clauses may be allowed?

A

Transocean Drilling UK v Providence Resources.
## Footnote
Clear and freely agreed clauses can be enforced.

24
Q

Which statute controls exclusion clauses in consumer contracts?

A

Consumer Rights Act 2015.
## Footnote
Applies to B2C contracts.

25
What does section 62 CRA 2015 provide?
Unfair terms are not binding on consumers. ## Footnote Based on the fairness test.
26
What is the fairness test under the CRA 2015?
Whether the term causes significant imbalance contrary to good faith. ## Footnote Focuses on consumer protection.
27
What exclusions can never be made under section 65 CRA 2015?
Liability for death or personal injury caused by negligence. ## Footnote These exclusions are always void.
28
What implied terms cannot be excluded under section 31 CRA 2015?
Statutory rights relating to goods. ## Footnote Includes quality and fitness for purpose.
29
Which statute controls exclusion clauses in B2B contracts?
Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977. ## Footnote Applies only to certain clauses.
30
What does section 2(1) UCTA 1977 prohibit?
Excluding liability for death or personal injury by negligence. ## Footnote This is never allowed.
31
What does section 2(2) UCTA 1977 allow?
Excluding liability for property damage by negligence if reasonable. ## Footnote Subject to reasonableness test.
32
What does section 3 UCTA 1977 allow?
Excluding liability for breach of contract if reasonable. ## Footnote Applies mainly to standard form contracts.
33
What is the knowledge test under section 11 UCTA 1977?
Whether the term was reasonable based on what was known at contract formation. ## Footnote Concealment suggests unreasonableness.
34
What factors are considered under Schedule 2 UCTA 1977?
Bargaining power, inducements, knowledge of term, and special orders. ## Footnote Used to assess reasonableness.
35
How does bargaining power affect reasonableness?
Clauses imposed by stronger parties are less likely to be reasonable. ## Footnote Protects weaker parties.
36
How does customer inducement affect reasonableness?
Discounts or incentives may make a clause reasonable. ## Footnote Voluntary agreement matters.
37
How does clarity of terms affect reasonableness?
Unclear terms are likely to be unreasonable. ## Footnote Transparency is essential.
38
How do special orders affect reasonableness?
Goods made to special order make limitation clauses more reasonable. ## Footnote Risk allocation is justified.
39
How do time limits on claims affect reasonableness?
Very short time limits are likely unreasonable. ## Footnote E.g. 7-day limits are unfair.