What is the rule of privity?
Case?
Only someone who is a party to a contract can sue on it
Tweddle v Atkinson - son’s dad & father in law contract
How many common law exceptions to privity are there?
Exception to privity: agency
Agent = someone who enters contract on your behalf
Law treats you and the agent as one & the same
Exception to privity: restrictive covenants that run with land
Case
promises to NOT do something on land, and EVERYONE who owns the
land is bound by it, no matter how old it is.
Tulk v Moxhay - person who set up covenant can sue anyone who breaches it, even if they’re not directly involved
Exception to privity: damages on behalf of others
Case?
Those who are affected by D’s actions can sue even if they werent directly involved in a contract
Jackson v Horizon Holidays - whole family had bad holiday
> even if someone(s) is not directly involved in the contract, they can still get compensation
Exception to privity: collateral contracts
if a contract is made as a result of a first contract, and an assurance of
quality is made to a party
of the first contract by the party of the second contract, they can sue them even though they technically weren’t involved
What 3 things must you prove for collateral contracts
Case?
Shanklin Pier v Detel Products - S. hired B. to do work, D. guaranteed paint quality
> the guarantee of quality allows them to be sued
What 3 parts of the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 must you explain in a [20]
What case is used for Contracts (RoTO) Act 1999?
S.1 (1) (a)
S.1 (1) (b)
S.1 (2)
Nisshin Shipping v Cleaves - C. Got 1% commission in a contract
> C. deserves enforcable rights
What does S.1 (1) (a) show about suing someone who’s not a direct party to a contract?
contract expressly states a third party can enforce it.
Eg. A + B make contract to build house for C, and contract says “Co can sue for incomplete work”
What does S.1 (1) (b) show about suing someone who’s not a direct party to a contract?
Contract purports to confer a benefit on a third-party
Eg. A + B make contract to build house and contract states “house given in good condition”
What does S.1 (2) show about suing someone who’s not a direct party to a contract?
Contract can exclude third-party rights
A + B make contract to build house for C, and contract says C cannot sue for in complete work
(overrides S.1 (1) (b)