What is the definition of theft under the Theft Act 1968?
Theft is when a person dishonestly appropriates property belonging to another with the intention of permanently depriving the other of it.
## Footnote
Defined under section 1 Theft Act 1968.
What are the five elements of theft?
Appropriation, property, belonging to another, dishonesty, and intention to permanently deprive.
## Footnote
All elements must be proven.
Which section of the Theft Act covers appropriation?
Section 3 Theft Act 1968.
## Footnote
This is usually the first element considered.
How does s3(1) Theft Act 1968 define appropriation?
Any assumption by a person of the rights of an owner.
## Footnote
Assuming even one right is sufficient.
What does assumption mean in appropriation?
Taking on or over an owner’s rights.
## Footnote
Includes selling, destroying, or lending.
Which case shows replacing price labels is appropriation?
R v Morris.
## Footnote
Assuming one right of ownership is enough.
Which case shows offering stolen goods for sale can be appropriation?
R v Pitham & Hehl.
## Footnote
Selling or offering to sell counts.
Which case shows consent does not always prevent appropriation?
Lawrence v MPC.
## Footnote
Consent must be genuine.
Which case shows accepting a valid gift can still be appropriation?
R v Hinks.
## Footnote
Applies where the donor is vulnerable.
Which section of the Theft Act defines property?
Section 4 Theft Act 1968.
## Footnote
Broad definition.
How does s4 Theft Act 1968 define property?
Money, real or personal property, including things in action and other intangible property.
## Footnote
Covers tangible and intangible items.
What is meant by a thing in action?
A legal right that can be enforced, such as money in a bank account.
## Footnote
It is intangible property.
What is intangible property?
Property that cannot be physically touched or held.
## Footnote
E.g. copyright.
Can land be stolen under the Theft Act?
Generally no, but there are exceptions.
## Footnote
Land is usually excluded.
When can land be stolen?
If land is severed, fixtures are removed, or someone abuses legal authority over land.
## Footnote
Set out in section 4(2).
Which case shows bodily fluids can be property?
R v Welsh.
## Footnote
Urine sample was property.
Are corpses or body parts property?
No, unless they have acquired value through skill or preservation.
## Footnote
General rule with an exception.
Which case shows body parts are not property?
R v Kelly and Lindsay.
## Footnote
But value can make them property.
Is information property under the Theft Act?
No.
## Footnote
Information alone cannot be stolen.
Which case shows information is not property?
Oxford v Moss.
## Footnote
Exam information was not property.
Which case shows exam papers can be property?
R v Akbar.
## Footnote
Physical papers were personal property.
Which section of the Theft Act defines belonging to another?
Section 5 Theft Act 1968.
## Footnote
Focuses on possession and control.
How does s5(1) define belonging to another?
Property belongs to another if they have possession, control, or a proprietary interest.
## Footnote
Ownership is not required.
Which case shows property can belong to someone in possession or control?
R v Turner.
## Footnote
Stole his own car from a garage.