Frustration Flashcards

(28 cards)

1
Q

What is frustration?

A

Discharge of contract due to unforeseen event making performance impossible.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are the 3 areas of frustration?

A
  1. When applies 2. Limits 3. Effects
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Which case introduced frustration?

A

Taylor v Caldwell – hall burned down.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What does Taylor v Caldwell establish?

A

Contract ends if impossible through no fault of either party.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are the 3 types of frustrating events?

A

Impossibility, Illegality, Radical change

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is impossibility of performance?

A

Subject matter destroyed or unavailable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Which case shows destruction of subject matter?

A

Taylor v Caldwell

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Which case shows subject matter unavailable?

A

Jackson v Union Marine

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Which case shows inconvenience is not enough?

A

Tsakiroglou v Noblee Thorl

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Key rule from Tsakiroglou?

A

More difficult ≠ frustrated

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is illegality in frustration?

A

Change in law makes contract illegal.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Which case shows illegality?

A

Denny Mott v James Fraser

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is radical change in circumstances?

A

Contract becomes pointless / purpose fails

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Which case shows purpose fails?

A

Krell v Henry

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Which case shows 2 purposes rule?

A

Herne Bay v Hutton

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Rule from Herne Bay?

A

If one purpose still possible → no frustration

17
Q

Which case shows inconvenience not enough?

A

Davis Contractors v Fareham UDC

18
Q

Rule from Davis Contractors?

A

Inconvenience ≠ radical change

19
Q

What are limits on frustration?

A

Foreseeability + Self-induced

20
Q

What is foreseeable events limit?

A

If event foreseeable → no frustration

21
Q

Which case shows foreseeability limit?

A

Amalgamated Investment v John Walker

22
Q

What is self-induced frustration?

A

D caused the frustrating event

23
Q

Which case shows self-induced frustration?

A

Super Servant Two

24
Q

Effect of frustration governed by?

A

Law Reform (Frustrated Contracts) Act 1943

25
What does s.1(2) provide?
Money paid recoverable minus expenses
26
Which case shows s.1(2)?
Gamerco v ICM
27
What does s.1(3) provide?
Payment for valuable benefit conferred
28
Key idea of s.1(3)?
Court awards value of partial performance