What is ERIC actually for?
ERIC is a taxonomy of implementation strategies meant to support deliberate strategy selection. It is not a checklist of actions to deploy indiscriminately.
What problem does ERIC help prevent?
Random or habitual strategy use, such as defaulting to training, reminders, or mandates without diagnosing the underlying constraint.
What is the most common ERIC misuse?
Selecting strategies based on familiarity or ease rather than alignment with diagnosed determinants.
Why is ERIC dangerous without diagnosis?
Because misaligned strategies increase burden, resistance, and mistrust while appearing proactive.
What question should precede any ERIC strategy choice?
What specific constraint is limiting adoption, correct use, or sustainment right now?
When does training make sense as a strategy?
When lack of knowledge or skill is the primary constraint and workflow and capacity are already supportive.
When does training reliably fail?
When time pressure, workflow misfit, or design complexity are the true constraints.
What does ERIC say about reminders and alerts?
They are weak strategies that rely on attention and memory and should not compensate for poor design.
When do reminders backfire?
When they add noise, increase cognitive load, or signal loss of trust.
What strategy cluster is most overused?
Train and educate stakeholders. It is easy to deploy but often misaligned.
What strategy cluster is most underused?
Change infrastructure and workflow. These are harder but higher-leverage.
What ERIC insight helps avoid compliance framing?
Strategies should reduce friction and increase fit, not increase surveillance or enforcement.
When do mandates appear to work but actually fail?
When they produce surface adoption with hidden workarounds and fragile sustainment.
What strategy mistake creates strategy churn?
Switching strategies repeatedly without revisiting the original determinant diagnosis.
How does ERIC interact with CFIR?
CFIR identifies determinants; ERIC helps select strategies matched to those determinants.
What ERIC mistake harms equity?
Applying uniform strategies across sites with unequal capacity and resources.
When does facilitation make sense as a strategy?
When coordination, sense-making, or local adaptation are the limiting factors.
When does facilitation become a crutch?
When it substitutes for fixing structural or design problems.
What ERIC strategy signals good implementation maturity?
Shifting from external support to embedded, routine system changes.
What is a red flag that a strategy is misaligned?
Rising burden, workarounds, or enforcement despite increased effort.
In one line, how should practitioners use ERIC?
As a menu of options to choose from deliberately, based on diagnosed constraints—not as a list of things to do.